Yeah bro just put your name here bro it will totally make it seem more authentic bro, like real science broThe latest results say otherwise.

https://news.rub.de/english/press-releases/2025-03-26-astrophysics-kilo-degree-survey-confirms-standard-model-cosmology

>>16634826
If you can't understand the idea of a collaboration, you are officially too dumb to debate cosmology.>>16634827
>rub.de
might as well go to /pol/>>16634825
YWNBAP> enough to suggest that there's something we're missing, and that there may be some sort of fundamental mistake we've made in the standard cosmological model

Gee no shit, that's why there's 500 other models, because nobody can come up with an experimentally testable theory of everything, just math.Oh so it turns out the universe may not be accelerating in its expansion and potentially not expanding at all depending how strong the effects of time dilation are on light that travels between us and visible supernovae, since that light is the entire basis of the idea that it's expanding.

It's certainly a more comforting idea that life could persist forever, even if it all dies through the crunch phase of a "big bounce" than to assume eventual infinite entropy and heat death. An optimistic cosmology speaks to me more... what can I say, I'm human.>>16634887
you are not human though but a literal chatbot>>16634887
>potentially not expanding at all depending how strong the effects of time dilation are on light that travels between us and visible supernovae, since that light is the entire basis of the idea that it's expanding.
Nope. The idea you're referring to is still based on an expanding universe, it's also driving acceleration. If there was no expansion at all then time dilation would average out to zero and there would be no redshift or Hubble's law. And there are many tests of the expanding universe.

husbant, the data does not fit your theory..

< back to boards

< back to threads